Lov-3

Media, Sports and News

State of the Union Date Night on Capitol Hill

Tonight more than 190 members of Congress will sit with a member of the opposing party — sitting together for the second straight year rather than divided to listen to President Obama’s State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in what has casually been dubbed “date night” on Capitol Hill.

Republicans and Democrats have traditionally sat separately on their respective sides of the aisle. But in the wake of the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona last year, members of Congress teamed up for the first time, projecting a greater sense of unity and civility in politics.

Following a year that could go down as one of the fiercest and most partisan years on Capitol Hill in recent memory, the proposal for another bipartisan, mixed seating arrangement was envisioned again this year by Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., at the one-year remembrance ceremony of the Tucson shooting earlier this month.

“It’s a symbolic gesture,” Udall spokeswoman Tara Trujillo said. “It was a nice moment of bipartisanship last year. The tradition is more divisive than anything and there’s no reason to continue it. It helps change the climate at least for a day.”

Some members of Congress quickly got on board, but the enthusiasm and luster of last year’s novel idea seemed to be missing.

While some members of Congress took to Twitter, Facebook and released statements announcing who they have chosen as their date to sit with at tonight’s address, the popular “who are you going with?” question wasn’t heard as often in the halls of Congress this year compared to last year.

“Proud to sit w/my friend @SenJohnMcCain for State of the Union next week; we can’t afford to let #bipartisanship be a dirty word in DC #SOTU,” Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., tweeted.

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords will sit on the Democratic side between Reps. Jeff Flake, a Republican, and Raul Grijalva, a Democrat. At last year’s State of the Union address, shortly after Giffords was shot and wounded, Flake and Grijalva flanked an empty seat reserved for the congresswoman.

Like last year, there are also some odd-couple pairings in the mixed-seating chart this year.

Freshmen Reps. David Cicilline, D-R.I., and Nan Hayworth, R-N.Y., co-chairs of the bipartisan Common Ground Caucus, will sit next to each other.

“The State of the Union address is an opportunity for all of us in Congress to show a spirit of cooperation among members of both parties,” Cicilline and Hayworth wrote in a joint statement. “In the weeks ahead we can join together to bring back ‘made in America,’ eliminate burdensome regulations for small business owners, and get our economy on the right track to put millions of our unemployed citizens back to work.”

Sens. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., will also sit side-by-side.

Reps. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., and Bob Latta, R-Ohio, have decided to sit together. So have Reps. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., and Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif. Sometimes the relationship that helps create the match can be obscure. Donnelly and Latta serve together on the Congressional Steel Caucus, while Grimm and Sanchez serve together on the Congressional Morocco Caucus.

“There is far too much partisan bickering at a time in which Congress should be solely focused, in a bipartisan way, on getting America’s economy back on track,” Donnelly said.

In some cases, lawmakers are opting to sit with a member from their state from the opposing party.

Arkansas Reps. Steve Womack, a Republican, and Rep. Mike Ross, a Democrat, sat together at last year’s State of the Union and plan to do it again this year. Sens. Bob Casey, D-Pa., and Pat Toomey. R-Pa., announced their mixed seating with a nod to their constituents’ concerns.

“Pennsylvanians want their lawmakers to work together to solve problems,” Casey said in a statement.

“As the second session of the 112th Congress begins, sitting next to each other is a small but worthwhile step toward setting a civil and cooperative tone for the challenging work ahead of us,” Toomey added in a statement.

One senator, however, will be without his date.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., was to have paired up to sit with Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill. But now Kirk will not attend the speech as he recovers in Chicago from a stroke this weekend.

“While I’ll miss him at the State of Union tomorrow night, I promised Mark that I will keep his seat warm,” Manchin said in a statement Monday.

A bipartisan delegation of members from upstate New York will also to sit together. Democrats Brian Higgins, Bill Owens, Kathy Hochul, and Paul Tonko will sit with Republicans Tom Reed, Ann Marie Buerkle, Chris Gibson, and Richard Hanna.

“While this is a small step toward bipartisanship, I believe Congress has a historic opportunity to come together and work for what is best for New York and the rest of the nation,” Owens said. “I hope to continue working with members of both parties to create opportunities for New York’s working families and small business owners.”

Matt Bennett, spokesman and senior vice president of the think tank Third Way, which has teamed up to boost participation in the mixed seating, says that this year may be slightly different than last year because the Giffords shooting seemed to inspire an “organic” moment.

“We did it in the wake of the shooting because such overwhelming sent that dig and civility had to be restored,” Bennett said but said that is a message that still should resonate. “It is a very public display of civility on a night when Americans are paying a lot of attention and given how far Congress has fallen in the opinion of most Americans this gesture of good will we think is important.”

‘I’ll never forget the trust you placed in me’: Gabby Giffords steps down from Congress a year after she was shot in the head

  • Giffords says in a YouTube video she is getting better and vows to return to public life
  • Sets up speculation that her husband NASA astronaut Mark Kelly will run for her Congressional seat
  • Giffords, a Democrat, narrowly won a tough re-election campaign in 2010 and would face another challenge in November
  • Will finish the meet-and-greet political event today that erupted in deadly shooting spree
  • President Obama calls retiring Giffords an ‘inspiration’
  • Decision to step down opens up a wide-open race to fill her spot

By Michael Zennie and Jennifer Madison

Last updated at 9:39 AM on 23rd January 2012

Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords will resign from Congress this week, a year after she was shot in the head while meeting constituents in Tucson.

Giffords made the announcement in a YouTube video posted Sunday afternoon in which she explained in a halting, sometimes slurred, voice that she must continue healing before she can represent residents of her district again.

‘I have more work to do on my recovery so to do what is best for Arizona I will step down this week,’ she said.

Stepping down: Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords announced her resignation in a YouTube video Sunday afternoon. She said she still has to recover

However, she vowed to step back into public life when her rehabilitation is complete.

‘I’m getting better every day. My spirit is high. I will return and we will work together for Arizona and this great country.’

The two-minute video features images from her recovery, which has captivated the country.

It also shows images of the vibrant 41-year-old Congresswoman before the attack, her wavy blond locks a contrast to the close-cropped style she has worn since undergoing several emergency brain surgeries.

‘A lot has happened over the past year. We cannot change that,’ she says.

‘I don’t remember much from that horrible day but I will never forget the trust you placed in me to be your voice.’

As her final act as congresswoman in her district, Giffords will finish the meet-and-greet political event today that erupted in the deadly spree.

Giffords’ office says the congresswoman will finish the Congress On Your Corner event. In a private gathering, she will meet with some of the people who were at theJanuary 8, 2011 event in a Safeway parking lot when a gunman killed six people and wounded 13 others, including Giffords.

Dramatic change: The shooting has changed Giffords’ appearance and made it difficult for her to speak and walk

Those attending will include some of the wounded, others who helped them, and people who subdued the attacker.

Giffords will also visit a family assistance centre that was set up after she was seriously wounded.

The announcement of her last congressional duties came after President Barack Obama praised Representative Giffords, calling her an ‘inspiration’ and ‘the very bestof what public service should be.’

‘I’m getting better every day. My spirit is high. I will return and we will work together for Arizona and this great country.’

- Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords

Mr Obama recognised Giffords for her ‘dedication to fairness, a willingness to listen to different ideas, anda tireless commitment to the work of perfecting our union.’

He says Giffords and her husband, astronaut Mark Kelly, ‘have taught us the true meaning of hope in the face of despair’ and ‘determination in the face of incredible odds.’

The president says the congresswoman’s ‘cheerful presence will be missed in Washington.’

The congresswoman’s decision to step down from her seat opens up a wide-open race to fill her spot in her southeastern Arizona district.

It will set up not one but two entire elections cycles, with new congressional lines in each thanks to congressional redistricting.

Governor Jan Brewer will call a special primary election sometime in April and then a general election in June to fill Gifford’s seat in the 8th Congressional District. That will be followed by a regular primary and general election for the new 2nd District.

Recovering: Giffords and Kelly made a much-celebrated appearance at a memorial marking the one-year anniversary of the shooting spree

Thethree-term Democrat was widely considered a shoo-in for re-election because of her tragic shooting at a Tucson constituent meeting a year ago.

On January 8, 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire on Giffords and several people she was meeting at a Safeway grocery store outside Tucson, authorities said.

Six people, including federal judge John Roll and a nine-year-old girl were killed.

The attack left Giffords fighting for her life after she suffered significant brain trauma from a gunshot wound.

Shehas recently begun appearing in public after being released from the hospital, including a much-celebrated appearance in Congress August 1.

Giffords recently appeared at a memorial marking the one-year anniversary of the shooting spree.

The Congresswoman, who had to re-learn how to walk, stepped onto the podium at the event and recited the pledge of allegiance while an adoring crowd chanted her name.

Though she has made a dramatic recovery since doctors put her in a drug-induced coma directly after the shooting, her resignation from Congress cannot be considered a dramatic surprise.

In an interview with ABC News in November, Giffords said she would not return to work until she was fully recovered.

Giffords has only been back to Congress once since the shooting, a surprise visit in August during the debt ceiling debate

Her public appearances have revealed that she has trouble forming sentences and communicating as she once did.

Giffords’ speech therapist has said the Congresswoman still has a lot of work to do before she has fully recovered.

If she had stayed in office, she would have faced the possibility of having to defend her seat in the November election.

The moderate Democrat narrowly won a third term after a hard-fought re-election campaign in 2010.

Her resignation will lead to a special election in June to fill her seat until the general election in November.

Some have speculated her husband Mark Kelly, who has been her constant companion during her recovery, will run for her seat.

Kelly, a NASA astronaut, commanded the space shuttle Endeavor’s final mission into space in May.

If he does run, he will have access to the $875,000 Giffords has in her campaign coffers.

The resignation garnered praise for Giffords from both side of the political aisle.

‘Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords has been a true bright star – a dynamic and creative public servant. Gabby’s message of bipartisanship and civility is one that all in Washington and the nation should honour and emulate,’ House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi said in a statement.

Republican House Speaker John Boehner offered: ‘I salute Congresswoman Giffords for her service, and for the courage and perseverance she has shown in the face of tragedy. She will be missed.’

 

Unemployment benefits extension: What’s at stake

The deadline to file for federal unemployment benefits is at year’s end unless Congress passes an extension.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Millions of unemployed Americans are anxiously waiting for Congress to take up the extension of federal unemployment benefits.

If lawmakers don’t act, the checks could stop coming as soon as January.

CNNMoney explains what’s at stake:

What are federal unemployment benefits? During major economic downturns, Congress authorizes federal unemployment benefits to augment state jobless benefits, which last up to 26 weeks.

Lawmakers first approved federal unemployment benefits in June 2008. Since then, Congress has lengthened the federal program and extended the deadline to file until the end of 2011.

Federal benefits consist of up to 53 weeks of emergency compensation, divided into four tiers, and up to another 20 weeks of extended benefits.

Here’s how it works: When a person becomes unemployed, they file for state unemployment benefits. Once the state benefits are exhausted, the federal benefits kick in.

How long they can receive benefits depends on the unemployment rate in their state and on their work history — the maximum is 99 weeks.

But unless Congress acts, those who reach the end of their state benefits or federal tier will not be able to apply for additional benefits.

Some 17.6 million Americans have collected federal benefits over the past four years. The most recent extension, passed last December, kept 7 million people on the rolls.

What does Congress have to do to extend them? Lawmakers must vote to approve extending the deadline. They have lengthened or extended them eight times since they were first authorized.

When Congress passed a 13-month extension last December, it was thought by many to be the last. But since the economy hasn’t recovered as much as hoped and unemployment remains high, advocates say the lifeline must continue.

How much will it cost? The Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will cost $44 billion to extend federal benefits through 2012.

Jobless Americans have collected $434 billion in unemployment benefits over the past four years. Taxpayers have footed about $185 billion of the bill.

The last extension cost about $57 billion, but there were more people collecting unemployment benefits at that time. The rolls have been shrinking slowly as the economy picks up and as people exhaust their benefits or stop looking for work.

What’s the hold up? Both Republicans and Democrats generally agree that unemployment benefits should be extended. They don’t agree, however, how it should be paid for.

Republicans have insisted the cost be covered through steps such as spending reductions. House Speaker John Boehner unveiled a bill Friday that would gradually cut benefits back to 59 weeks, while implementing other reforms. It would be paid for by freezing federal workers’ pay, prohibiting millionaires from receiving unemployment and food stamp benefits and other measures.

Democrats, meanwhile, want the extension considered emergency spending so it would not have to be offset. Nearly all extensions since 2008 have been emergency spending.

What happens if they don’t get extended? Some 5 million people will stop getting checks next year, with nearly 2 million of them exhausting their benefits in January alone.

The jobless depend on these checks — which average about $296 a week — to feed their families and keep a roof over their heads, advocates say. Without extended benefits, the typical household receiving unemployment checks will see their income fall by a third, according to a report last year from President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers.

Jobless benefits also pump billions into the economy since recipients tend to spend their checks quickly. Each dollar of unemployment insurance collected pumps about $2 into the economy, according to some estimates.

Do you receive unemployment insurance? Have you not been looking for a job as hard because you are getting benefits? Email mailto: with your contact information and you could be contacted for an upcoming story or video. To top of page

Rick Perry Declares Himself ‘The Tim Tebow Of The Iowa Caucuses’

video » 56 comments

Rick Perry may have delivered the line of the night when he compared himself to Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow during Thursday’s Iowa debate, hosted by Fox News. Moderator Neil Cavuto asked the Texas governor about his lackluster debate skills and how he would fare going up against an accomplished debater in President Obama.

RELATED: Rick Perry On His Recent Gaffes: Voters ‘Aren’t Looking For A Robot’

“I want to share something with you, as each one of these debates — I’m kind of getting where I like these debates!” Perry exclaimed. “As a matter of fact, I hope Obama and I debate a lot. I’ll get there early! And we will get it on and we will talk about our differences which are great. I’ll talk about what we have done in the state of Texas and talk about passing a balanced budget amendment to the United States Congress. I’ll talk about having, the type of part-time Congress that I think Americans are ready for. You know, there are a lot of people out there, I understand it. There are a lot of folks that said Tim Tebow wasn’t going to be a very good NFL quarterback. There are people that stood up and said, ‘well, he doesn’t have the right throwing mechanisms, or he doesn’t — you know, he is not playing the game right.’ You know, he won two national championships and that looked pretty good. We’re the national champions in job creation back in Texas. But am I ready for the next level? Let me tell you, I hope I am the Tim Tebow of the Iowa caucuses!”

Watch Perry’s bold comparison below, via Fox News:

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite’s daily newsletter.

Final GOP Presidential Debate: Rick Perry Mocked by Media for Tim Tebow Comparison

The debate was co-sponsored by the Iowa Republican Party and Fox News, with the channel’s anchors Bret Baier, Chris Wallace, Neil Cavuto and Megyn Kelly acting as moderators.

PHOTOS: 10 Entertainers Democrats and Republicans Love to Hate

With his recent surge in the polls, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich attracted the most attention from other candidates, with Michelle Bachman raising the large consulting fees he received from Freddie Mac and Rick Santorum making an oblique reference to the thrice-married Gingrich’s personal life.

Gingrich parried those attacks and addressed charges by chief rival Mitt Romney that he doesn’t have the temperament to be president. “I sometimes get accused of using language that is too strong. So I’ve been standing here editing,” Gingrich said. Taking a jibe at a recent Romney comment in a New York Times interview calling him “zany,” Gingrich added, “I’m very concerned about not appearing to be zany.”

PHOTOS: 10 Hollywood Players That Will Make a Difference in the 2012 Elections

But the highlight of the evening, at least as far as the media was concerned, came when Texas Gov. Rick Perry compared himself to Denver Broncos star quarterback Tim Tebow. “There are a lot of folks out there who said Tim Tebow isn't going to be a good NFL quarterback. Am I ready for the next level? Let me tell you, I am ready to be the Tim Tebow of the Iowa caucuses."

Perry’s comparison caught the attention of CNN host Piers Morgan, who tweeted, “I think Rick 'Tebow' Perry just debated himself back into contention #iowa.”

But many in the media made fun of Perry for comparing himself to the quarterback, who has posted a 7-1 record as a starter over the last two months.

CNN contributor Roland Martin joked on Twitter, “Uh, oh! Rick Perry is likening himself to Tim Tebow. 'I hope I am the Tim Tebow of the Iowa caucuses.' Start praying, bruh!”

While The New York Times writer Don Van Natta Jr. tweeted, “Tim Tebow is now praying that he never becomes the Rick Perry of the NFL.”

Howard Fineman of the Huffington Post tweeted, "Rick Perry gets the prize for being first to mention Tim Tebow. The only thing he didn't do was do a Tebow."

In another tweet, Roll Call's Ryan Beckwith used a football reference to make fun of the Texas governor. "Rick Perry namechecks Tim Tebow. If he wins a debate against Obama, will he drop on one knee?"

The New York Times Five-Thirty-Eight blogger Nate Silver joked in a tweet that the comparison represented a whole new direction for the Perry campaign: "New Rick Perry campaign slogan: Faith, Jobs and Tebow."

The Washington Post's Chris Cillizza tweeted: "And my head just exploded. #iowadebate" after Perry made the Tebow comparison.

Comedian Andy Borowitz focused on Gingrich instead of Perry, tweeting: “Gingrich: "I believe that wife begins at insemination." #iowadebate.”

Other celebrities who tweeted about the debate used the opportunity to make jokes about the entire Republican party. George Lopez tweeted, “Watching the Republican Presidential Debate is like eves dropping at STARBUCKS ! #FTP's.” 

But it was actress Ellen Barkin who fired the zinger of the evening, tweeting: “Love it when Fox News moderates a debate. They must be sorry L'il Adolf isn't running.”

The final GOP debate before Iowa: what each candidate needs to do

Michele Bachmann, of Minn., stand together prior to their Republican debate, on Dec. 10, in Des Moines, Iowa. Thursday is a red-letter day in the seemingly interminable run-up to the Iowa caucuses: the last debate before Hawkeye State Republicans head

What will likely be the final GOP debate before the January 3rd Iowa caucuses will take place later this evening from the Sioux City Convention Center in Sioux City, Iowa. The debate is sponsored by Fox News and will feature

What will likely be the final GOP debate before the January 3rd Iowa caucuses will take place later this evening from the Sioux City Convention Center in Sioux City, Iowa. The debate is sponsored by Fox News and will feature

Thursday night, the Republican presidential candidates will convene for the 13th televised debate of the 2012 cycle, the fourth from Fox News. Here is a breakdown of the debates to date, by the numbers: Continue Reading Text Size – + reset May 5,

But the GOP minority in the Senate, pushed by Wisconsin GOP Tea Party Senator Ron Johnson, has blocked President Obama's plan from even coming to a vote by the use of filibusters (obstruction) which require a super-majority (60 votes) to end debate.

Congress Agrees on Spending Deal Likely to Avert Government Shutdown

WASHINGTON –   Republicans and Democrats in Congress found a compromise way Thursday night out of a deeply partisan standoff that threatened millions of Americans with a big New Year’s tax increase, the unemployed with loss of government benefits and the whole federal government with a shutdown.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said congressional bargainers were preparing a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut and expiring jobless benefits as a fallback plan in case negotiations on a yearlong package do not succeed.

The logjam was broken one day before the government would have been forced to close its doors because of a lack of money, the result of a tangled dispute over taxes and spending. The issues have become a kind of holy grail among politicians facing elections in less than 11 months.

At issue are the extension of a reduced tax Americans automatically pay into the Social Security pension plan, extended federal government payments to the unemployed and funding to keep the government working.

President Barack Obama and the Democrats had wanted to pay for the extended Social Security tax break, a reduction in the so-called payroll tax, by imposing a 1.9 percent surtax on incomes of the richest Americans, those taking home more than $1 million a year. They apparently have dropped that demand and will find the money to finance continued cuts through higher fees charged by the mixed public-private organization that guarantees home mortgages.

Congressional Republicans had steadfastly refused to accept any increase on taxes, a bedrock issue for the party.

A new poll shows Americans hold members of Congress from both parties in record low regard, but see Republicans as more to blame for the legislature’s poor record of lawmaking this year.

That combined with a new Associated Press-GfK poll that shows Americans broadly in favor of an extension of the Social Security tax cut and a lengthened period of unemployment compensation payments may have helped engender the new mood for compromise.

A poll released Thursday by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found public discontent with Congress at record levels, with two-thirds of those surveyed saying current members of Congress should be voted out of office next year. By a margin of nearly two-to-one (40 percent to 23 percent ), more of those questioned by Pew blamed Republican leaders than Democratic leaders for Congress’ “do-nothing” record.

The new AP-GfK poll found that most Americans, six in 10, want Congress to approve an extension of the payroll tax reduction. What’s more, the dragged-out debate over the extension is just one of many issues that have kept voters furious with their leaders all year. Sixty percent said they are angry about the political situation.

With that as a background, congressional leaders began speaking about compromise.

“We can extend payroll tax relief for American workers and create new jobs and keep the government running and, frankly, we can do it in a bipartisan way,” Rep. John Boehner, Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, told reporters in a turnabout from weeks of partisan sniping from both sides.

“No more show votes,” Boehner said after praising earlier remarks by Reid, a Democrat, who said that lingering disagreements on a mammoth spending bill could be resolved easily: “It’s just time to legislate.”

Reid opened the Senate’s morning session by saying he and the chamber’s top Republican had held talks to resolve remaining disputes. With lawmakers itching to return home before the holidays, Reid said he and the leader of the Senate’s Republican minority, Sen. Mitch McConnell, hope they can reach a deal “that would get us out of here in a reasonable time, in the next few days.”

Standing just across the aisle, McConnell agreed with Reid — a stark contrast to recent days, when the two have fired sharp partisan volleys at each other.

“We’re confident, optimistic we’ll be able to resolve both on a bipartisan basis,” said McConnell, referring to one bill that would renew the payroll tax cut and jobless benefits, and a separate spending measure that would keep federal agencies open.

Obama applied pressure of his own, saying Congress “should not and cannot” go home until it had resolved the issues.

“There’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to extend these items, the payroll tax cut, u.i. before holidays,” he said, using the abbreviation for unemployment insurance. “There’s no reason the government should shut down over this, and I expect all of us to do what’s necessary in order to do the people’s business and make sure that it’s done before the end of the year.”

After weeks of partisan battle, a clear sign of movement came late Wednesday, when aides said Democrats were abandoning their demand for a surtax on millionaires to help finance payroll tax cuts.

Like congressional leaders, White House press secretary Jay Carney also expressed optimism Thursday about bipartisan compromise. “We believe a deal can get done,” he said.

Though Obama has said repeatedly the wealthy need to “pay their fair share,” Carney said the White House was open to other ways to pay for unemployment benefits and the payroll tax cut, and he downplayed what had been a major Obama argument.

“The president’s priority has not been how it’s paid for or raising taxes. It’s been lowering taxes for the vast majority of Americans,” Carney said.

As part of a tax deal reached late last year, after Republicans swept back into control in the House, the payroll tax that funds Social Security, was cut from 6.2 percent of gross income to 4.2 percent. Employers were still left paying their full 6.2 percent share. Obama had proposed making the cut even deeper next year and including employers in the reduction. That quickly evaporated when the battles broke out in Congress.

On the separate spending dispute that threatened a government shutdown, House Republicans had said Wednesday night that they would try pushing a massive $1 trillion spending bill through the House on Friday to prevent a federal shutdown. Reid said Thursday that he believed remaining partisan disputes on that bill could be settled quickly.

The pre-Christmas wrangling caps a contentious year in a capital hindered by divided government, with Democrats controlling the White House and the Senate and Republicans run the House. Lawmakers have engaged in down-to-the-wire drama even when performing the most mundane acts of governing, such as keeping agencies functioning and extending federal borrowing authority, tasks that are only becoming more politically delicate as the calendar nears the 2012 election year.

The original Republican-approved version of a payroll tax cut bill that passed the House this week drew solid opposition from Democrats and Obama in part because it would have forced work on the Keystone XL oil pipeline from western Canada to Texas Gulf Coast refineries, which Obama would rather delay. They also are unhappy that the bill is financed by cuts to civilian federal workers, Obama’s health care overhaul bill and other programs that Democrats say would avoid meaningful contributions from the rich.

Government shutdown preparations begin as funding talks stall

The Obama administration is alerting employees to the possibility of a partial government shutdown if talks on bills to fund the government and extend the payroll tax cut collapse later this week.

With Congress facing a midnight Friday deadline to either pass a short-term or final measure to fund government operations for the remainder of the fiscal year, Cabinet secretaries and agency heads planned to send an e-mail message to workers by close of business Wednesday informing them that a shutdown could occur, according to multiple administration officials familiar with the plans.

A shutdown would not apply to a wide swath of agencies and departments that already have full-year funding in place thanks to a partial spending bill that passed in November, including the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, House and Urban Development, Justice, State, and Transportation, NASA, and other smaller agencies covered by separate appropriations measures.

In a statement, Office of Management and Budget spokesman Kenneth Baer said Wednesday that “There is no reason for the government to shut down.”Congress could act quickly to pass a short- or long-term spending measure, Baer said, as they have seven times already this year.

“We do need to be prepared for any contingency,” Baer said, which is why agencies were informing workers by e-mail.

In one example of the messages sent to federal workers Wednesday, the Interior Department told staffers that should a funding lapse occur, “Bargaining unit employees who are not engaged in one of the excepted functions will be placed in a furlough status,” the message said.

Decisions on which “essential” workers and functions would continue during a shutdown would be made before it begins, officials said, but official guidance on contingency operations generally requires anyone working on issues related to public health and safety to keep working.

Congress has passed two short-term spending measures to keep the government running since the fiscal year began Oct. 1. Lawmakers were expected this week to release a long-term spending measure to keep the government functional through September, but have yet to do so. Republicans insisted Tuesday they had a tentative deal with Democrats on the Appropriations Committee to fund the government through next September.

Republican leaders charged Tuesday that the White House and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) have instructed lawmakers who brokered the pact to withhold their final signatures from a report that would send the deal for a vote until votes are held on an extension of the payroll tax.

Federal agencies issued similar warnings to workers in early April as Congress and the White House faced a similar funding impasse. Those warnings came only after days of uncertainty and complaints from federal workers and their union leaders that the administration was keeping them in the dark about potential contingency plans.

Many employees also complained that they did not receive formal communications regarding contingency plans in a timely manner.

William R. Dougan, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees, said a shutdown “would be devastating for federal workers at agencies where funding has not yet been approved by Congress.”

“Federal workers shouldn’t have to spend the holidays worrying about how to make their next mortgage payment simply because Congress can’t get its act together,” Dougan said in a statement. “Federal employees, and indeed all Americans, deserve better from their government.”

Follow Ed O’Keefe on Twitter: @edatpost

More on FedPage and PostPolitics

Obama’s five paths to re-election

Gingrich: the GOP’s bomb-thrower

Perry kicks off Iowa bus tour

Gingrich aide out over Mormon comments

Senate Leaders Optimistic Government Shutdown Will be Averted

Like us on Facebook

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., started off the morning with remarks stating ongoing meetings with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell have been fruitful.

“We're confident, optimistic we'll be able to resolve both on a bipartisan basis,” said McConnell in reference to two bills, addressing a payroll tax cut and spending respectively.

The remarks by McConnell and Reid indicate a two-week stretch of partisan bickering over the bills may come to an end.

“We've done enough back and forth-the Republican leader and me staking out our positions, and our positions are fairly clear to the American people,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “What we're going to try to do during the next few hours is work toward resolving some of the outstanding issues.”

Senate Democratic aides have indicated the party's membership dropped their payroll tax cut proposal's most contentious measure, a surtax on incomes over a million dollars, according to the AP.

Absent Millionaire's Tax, Will Senate Republicans Support Deal?

With that major hurdle out of the way, it is possible the Senate Democrats could reach a middle ground with Republicans and garner enough votes to overcome a filibuster on any proposal that emerges.

The GOP-approved version of the payroll tax cut extension includes a controversial provision aimed at speeding up approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, which the White House has opposed. A new Senate version drops an original surtax aimed at paying for the payroll tax cut, replacing it with increased fees on the backing of mortgages by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as the sale of broadcast spectrum.

The omnibus spending bill, after it passes the House, will face some pushback at the Senate level, as the Obama administration has expressed reservations with certain portions. Reid called the issues “resolvable” and “small in number.” The House has yet to move on its bill but has promised to vote on it Thursday. It includes provisions to fund about 40 percent of government operations and contains a number of riders aimed at Obama Administration policies. Its passage could spark a fight with the White House and lead to a standstill.

Obama's Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer released a statement calling for another continuing resolution, until a workable deal around the payroll tax cut is ironed out. The president has used the specter of a government shutdown as a motivator to pass the payroll tax cut.

Federal agencies and Cabinet secretaries have reportedly alerted employees to prepare for a shutdown, with furloughs in the offing if Congress doesn't act by Friday night. A government shutdown would leave some agencies and departments without funding, including closing national parks and passport processing, according to The Washington Post.

To report problems or to leave feedback about this article, e-mail:

To contact the editor, e-mail:

Could We Be Headed Toward Yet Another Government Shutdown?

Shawn Thew / EPASpeaker of the House John Boehner listens to a question during a press conference in Washington, Dec. 13, 2011. Boehner predicted House passage of a bill renewing a payroll tax cut and curtailing extra benefits for the unemployed.

For what feels like the 624th time this year, the federal government on Friday will run out of money unless Congress acts. This deadline hasn’t gotten much ink because a) we’re all tired of writing the same fishbowl, government shutdown story, and b) congressional negotiators for once in their lives are on track to sign off on a bipartisan omnibus that would fund the government through the rest of the fiscal year, thus avoiding more of these embarrassing showdowns.

So, what’s the problem? This time, the hitch is actually unrelated to the appropriations process. It’s not about cuts to programs or savings in spending. Bizarrely enough, this time it’s about preventing a payroll tax hike. Should be a no-brainer, right, especially for all those anti-tax Republicans? Not so fast.

The fight has been over how to pay for a payroll-tax holiday. If nothing happens, the tax will snap back to 6.2% from 4.2% on Dec. 31 – something President Obama and Democrats have vowed they will not let happen. Keeping it at the current rate would cost $120 billion. Democrats would like to cut the rate further to 3.1%, for an additional $60 billion.

Also on the docket – and likely to be rolled into the same package – are an extension of unemployment benefits, expected to cost upwards of $55 billion; an Alternative Minimum Tax patch that will cost $135 billion; and a fix in the fees that Medicare pays to doctors, which is estimated to cost $39 billion. All told, more than $400 billion worth of legislation is on the table. Congress has come to the brink of a shutdown for less: Remember last spring when at the 11th hour a deal was struck to avert a shutdown over $39 billion in cuts to the 2011 budget?

The current fight has been over how to pay for these measures. Republicans insist they must be paid for – not adding to the deficit – and have suggested cuts to Medicare benefits. Democrats have rejected this out of hand and have, instead, put forth a surcharge on millionaires and using the savings from not fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Republicans reject the first as a tax hike and the latter as smoke and mirrors accounting as that money has yet to be spent. On the other hand, all congressional accounting is a form of smoke and mirrors – neither the AMT or Medicare doctors’ payments would need to be fixed if their formulas weren’t fundamentally broken, thus warranting annual patches.

How do this fight and the $1 trillion omnibus relate? Democrats are considering slow walking, or even refusing to sign the omnibus conference report, unless Republicans start to take real action on the tax extenders package, several congressional Democratic sources said. House Republicans on Tuesday are expected to pass their own version of the bill, which Senate Democrats have declared dead on arrival in the upper chamber. The House might be tempted to adjourn and head home for Christmas, thus forcing Senate Dems to pass their version, unless Democrats keep them in Washington, and the omnibus comes in handy for that.

On the other hand, government funding runs out on Friday, so that’s a ticking clock. Democrats are betting that, if worst comes to worst and the shutdown actually happens, they won’t get blamed given the number of times Republicans have cried wolf. Especially not when they can claim to be protecting the middle class from a tax hike — an argument Republicans have been struggling with in recent weeks. And the prospect of a shutdown could have implications for the 2012 GOP field. I wonder what Newt Gingrich, who perilously lost his own shutdown argument with Bill Clinton in the 1990s, would make of it?